- The Washington Post - The Washington Post

New black panthers intimidating voters, black panthers intimidate voters live footage

Christian Adams[ edit ] See also: She stated that because the story has pictures, it was the kind of story that you can run over and over again.

New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case: 'Bombshell' for Obama? - globicate.com

No complaints were filed by voters about the incident, although poll watchers witnessed some voters approach the polls and then turn away, apparently in response to the New Black Panther Party members.

The conduct for which members of the New Black Panther Party were accused of voter intimidation took place on Election Day in Novemberat a polling station in a predominantly African-American, Democratic voting district of Philadelphia. Republican poll watcher Chris Hill stated that voters were complaining about intimidation, while the District Attorney's office stated that they had not been contacted by any voters.

The election day incident was reported in the media immediately, and the Department of Justice decided to investigate.

New Black Panthers back at Philly voting site

Fine announced that he was opening a second investigation, focusing not on the New Black Panther case specifically but on the more general question of whether the Justice Department enforces voting rights laws "in a non-discriminatory manner," [24] as well as whether voting section employees have been harassed for investigating or prosecuting particular matters.

McCarthy referred to the comment by Bartle Bull, who witnessed the incident, that it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever encountered in his life, as well as the fact that it was highly unusual for the case to be dismissed after a default judgment against textos personales yahoo dating defendants had already been won.

The Mississippi case The Bush administration's decision to force civil rights attorneys to investigate Ike Brown — the black, Democratic official in Mississippi — caused anger. Morse turned over the video of the incident to ElectionJournal.

Best of MSNBC

Shabazz said in September that the New Black Panthers, who have called for the killing of whites and Jews, might monitor polling places again in It also says that many others see planes de colorat dinozauri online dating organization similarly.

Lichtman at American University. We still strongly believe in the campaign. Some may say the government was too lenient, that the case should not have been dropped against the three other defendants, or that the injunction against Shabazz should have extended nationwide -- not just in Philadelphia -- and for a much longer time not just until I have to tell you, this bothers me because I believe that they are not being race neutral in their enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.

April Learn how and when to remove this template message InMichael McGeean alderman in Milwaukeethreatened to disrupt white events throughout the city unless more jobs were created for black people.

zgrapher online dating

Smith praised the decision, stating "I am pleased that someone at the Justice Department is finally taking the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party case seriously. The Black Panthers were never a group of angry young militants full of fury toward the "white establishment.

The lawsuit accused them of using uniforms, racial insults and a weapon to intimidate voters and those who were there to assist them.

kelly clarksons cautionary christmas music tale online dating

Failing to find its own legitimacy in the black community, this band would graft the Party's name upon itself, which we condemn. Critics of the NBPP say that the group's politics represent a dangerous departure from the original intent of black nationalism ; specifically, that they are starkly anti-white, and also antisemitic.

Also, it notes that not all of its members are members of the Nation of Islamalthough the group acknowledges universal spirituality practices within the organization.

ardsley park boundaries in dating

The letter quoted the testimony of J. In other words, the decision not to pursue criminal charges was made by the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division prior to the Obama administration.

In that case, the Department of Justice later narrowed the charges against Minister King Shabazz and dismissed the charges against the party and Jackson.

chriqui emmanuelle dating advice

Although none of the defendants responded to the complaint, the Department decided last year to drop its case against all but King Samir Shabazz, the one with the nightstick.

And that's all they wanted.

New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case - WikiVisually

Reynolds confirmed that the draft was authentic, but said that it was not the most current version of the draft, and declined to immediately release the newest version or describe what revisions had been made to it. Jackson were dropped because the police officer who responded to the incident ordered Mr.

But according to Perez, "that did not absolve the Department of its legal and ethical obligations to ensure that any relief sought was consistent with the law and supported by the evidence. It simply is what it is I know what you are here to do.

Justice Department's rebuttal

Holder has rejected claims that his department considered the race of white alleged victims of voter intimidation in dropping the charges. Christian Adams as a partisan hired during the Bush administration, Coates has a pedigree different from many conservatives and cannot be ignored as easily.

Coates testified that the Justice Department's administration's decision to drop the Black Panther Case "was intended to send a direct message to people inside and outside the civil rights division.

Christian Adams See also: After the defendants did not appear for court, a default judgment was entered. Spakovsky has stated that internal e-mails from the Department of Justice released under a Freedom of Information Act request show that political appointees were "intimately involved" in the decision to drop the case, including former deputy attorney general David OgdenAssociate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli and attorney general Eric Holderand that Perez may have committed perjury by denying this in his testimony before the Civil Rights Commission.

New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case

In a vote along party linesthe resolution was defeated Perez stated there was insufficient evidence to support the case; [5] Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler stated that "The department makes enforcement decisions based on the merits, not the race, gender or ethnicity of any party involved.

Under the Bush Administration, a criminal investigation into the incident was started, but later dropped. In April Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer who was serving as a poll watcher at the polling station where the incident occurred, submitted an affidavit at the Department of Justice's request supporting the lawsuit, stating that he considered it to have been the most severe instance of voter intimidation he had ever encountered.

Ryerson University canceled the planned lecture. Benjamin Brink told Philadelphia radio station IQ Christian Adams and Christopher Coatesthe lead attorneys who had been involved in prosecuting the New Black Panther Party, to testify on why some of the complaints had been dismissed.

Just take a look at the video that they didn't prosecute.

qkc dating

Shabazz held a nightstick, and the two men were accused of making intimidating remarks to both white and black voters.