NSA Bulk Data Collection Illegal, U.S. Appeals Court Says | HuffPost NSA Bulk Data Collection Illegal, U.S. Appeals Court Says | HuffPost

William pauley nsa hookups, most popular

Less than two weeks ago, District Judge Richard Leon issued a grossly different decision while weighing in on a similar case filed by plaintiffs in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. What else would you expect?! Obama is expected next month to set forth his own proposals for possible surveillance reforms.

Judge Pauley is a traitor.

US judge rules NSA phone tapping legal | News | Al Jazeera

The 2nd Circuit is the first federal appeals court to rule on the NSA program's legality. Snowden could not immediately be reached for comment.

comment draguer sur tinder dating

Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. Because the data is classified as "metadata" it does not require a warrant to obtain under the Patriot Act.

Zimbabwe: Chamisa's lawyers contest election results in court

The judge also referred often to the September 11, attacks, in which nearly 3, people died, and said broad counter-terrorism programs such as the NSA's could help avoid a "horrific" repeat of those events.

The ACLU filed their lawsuit in June of this year just hours after reports revealed that the US government has been regularly compelling telecommunication companies for the basic call records pertaining to millions of Americans.

Pauley dismissed a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. Citing the Smith v.


Armed with all the metadata, NSA odbo korea online dating draw connections it might otherwise never be able to find. And if Congress reauthorizes Sectionthere could be further litigation that may ultimately require the Supreme Court's attention.

pagdating ng panahon composer erik

It is the very definition of an unreasonable search and seizure," it said. His decision is identical to letting a bank robber go free because he didn't Judge Pauley admitted in a decision penned in the Southern District of New York court that the NSA "vacuums up information about virtually every telephone call to, from, or within the United States," but that no evidence exists that the spy agency abuses this program to spy on people without ties to terrorist organizations.

US judge rules NSA phone surveillance lawful - France 24

It also declined to halt the program, noting that parts of the Patriot Act including Section expire on June 1. The ACLU did not immediately respond to a message for comment. Circuit Court of Appeals, No.

besser flirten mit diesen tipps cuny

Both cases interpreted a Supreme Court decision, Smith v. Department of Justice spokesman said the department is pleased with the decision. His leaks have sparked a debate over how much leeway to give the government in what they say is protecting Americans from terrorism.


In a page decision, Pauley said the program 'vacuums up information about virtually every telephone call to, from, or within the United States. Judge pauley said in his page ruling that the phone meta data collection "represents the Government's counter-punch" to terrorist threats that have been observed in the US since September 11, In ruling, the judge noted the Sept.

District Court Judge Richard Leon, who granted a preliminary injunction against the collecting of phone records of two men who had challenged the program. It said that because intelligence agencies could not point to specific cases where telephony metadata collection led to a major counter-terrorism success, the intrusiveness of such intelligence gathering might outweigh the public benefit.

The ACLU had no immediate comment.

NSA mass phone surveillance revealed by Edward Snowden ruled illegal

Mueller III for declaratory and injunctive relief from alleged constitutional rights by the NSA's bulk phone call metadata collection program. Share this article Share Pauley's decision contrasts with a ruling earlier this month by U. Obamaa district court opinion which found the NSA surveillance was "Orwellian" and "likely unconstitutional.

As soon as the journalists were able to work, everything that I had been trying to do was validated. Further, as the president's own review panel recently observed, there's no evidence that this dragnet program was essential to preventing any terrorist attack.

He had said that the surveillence is most likely to be unconstitutional.